- From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 10:06:01 +0200
- To: <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
> 5.4.1 rdfs:seeAlso > > You carefully don't say much here, which is good. However, I > think this > raises an issue which we should address (even if it's to > punt) before or > as part of LC: > > If a resource is named by something that looks like a URI, > then what expectations can we have about that? If we (through > some process) dereference that URI, what can we expect to > see? Ie, is there any expectation (and if so, when) that > the use of a web address to name something means that we > can get a description of the named thing by dereferencing that > address? Or does the web address name the description > itself? I see no reason to constrain objects of rdfs:seeAlso to web accessible resources. I would consider it acceptable to refer to e.g. a person, organization, printed book, etc. as a related resource. The nature of the associated resources can be described further, to clarify whether they are web accessible etc. Cheers, Patrick
Received on Wednesday, 15 January 2003 03:06:04 UTC