- From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 09:59:58 +0200
- To: <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
It was my understanding (or misunderstanding) that the WG had decided that the class extension of rdfs:Literal corresponded to those things denoted by literal nodes in the graph. The only odd man out being things (presumably) denoted by well formed but semantically invalid typed literals. I guess this needs clarification ASAP, and probably some revision of the MT. Pat? Patrick > -----Original Message----- > From: ext Peter F. Patel-Schneider > [mailto:pfps@research.bell-labs.com] > Sent: 14 January, 2003 15:41 > To: Stickler Patrick (NMP/Tampere) > Cc: jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com; w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > Subject: Re: Critical literal semantics issue > > > > The LCC version of the RDF Semantics as referenced on the RDF > Core WG home > page, at http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-mt-20030117/, > *explicitly* does not make the class extension of rdfs:Literal have > any relationship whatsoever to LV. There is even an entire > section of the > document on the non-relationship between > ICEXT(I(rdfs:Literal)) and LV. > > This decoupling of ICEXT(I(rdfs:Literal)) and LV causes lots > of problems, > as detailed in a message I sent to RDF comments > (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanM > ar/0014.html). > > Peter F. Patel-Schneider > Bell Labs Research > Lucent Technologies. > > > From: Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com > Subject: RE: Critical literal semantics issue > Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 11:27:57 +0200 > > > > > All this means is that rdfs:Literal denotes a class, but it > > > says nothing > > > > about the class extension of rdfs:Literal. > > > > > > The class extension of rdfs:Literal is understood to be a > subset of LV > > > (see further comments below), i.e. all resources which are > > > denoted by a > > > plain (untyped) literal or a valid typed literal are in > LV and hence > > > instances of rdfs:Literal. > > > > Or rather, the class extension of rdfs:Literal *is* LV. > > > > Patrick > >
Received on Wednesday, 15 January 2003 03:00:02 UTC