- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 17:42:20 +0000
- To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- CC: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
My copy of this test has the line _:j88096 <http://example.org/prop1> :j88097 . (with those numbers even) I believe this to be correct. I assume that this has been 'fixed' incorrectly since I got this copy. Jeremy Dave Beckett wrote: > We just had a comment on this test case on the rdf comments list: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0043.html > and this means an approved test case needs to be corrected to match > the rdf/xml grammar. > > This result: > http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr/test003.nt > > needs the following change: > > 15c15 > < _:j88096 <http://example.org/prop1> "" . > --- > >>_:j88096 <http://example.org/prop1> :j88097 . >> > > to match http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar/#emptyPropertyElt > where when both rdf:ID and rdf:bagID are both present, the statement > value is a blank node (the "Otherwise" clause) not an empty literal. > > The good news: > > [[P.s. Using SWI-Prolog from the CVS snapshot it processes the rest of > the test-suite properly now.]] > > So that makes nearly 4 full implementations of the parser test cases > (detailed evidence for this will have to be collected). > > Dave > >
Received on Monday, 13 January 2003 12:42:33 UTC