W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > December 2003

Re: RDFS interpretation of typed literals

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 09:55:03 +0000
Message-ID: <3FDED677.5060609@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org

Graham Klyne wrote:


> So I think the above statement is either True or False, depending on the 
> interpretation used.  So far, so good.  But is this an RDFS-entailment:
>   ex:s ex:p "foo"^^ddd .
> |=
>   ex:s ex:p _:b .
>   _:b rdf:type rdfs:Literal .
> Intuitively, I would have said "yes", but as far as I can tell from the 
> semantics spec, the answer is "no".  This is an entailment only in a 
> {RDFS,ddd}-interpretation, because it is only a D-interpretation that 
> places the required constraints on the relationships between 
> I(rdfs:Literal), LV and IL.
> Am I correct?  Is this what we expected?

As I recall, the way we handle datatype errors, i.e. where "foo" is not 
in the lexical space of ddd, is to say that "foo"^^ddd is not a member 
of rdfs:Literal.  Therefore it is only appropriate datatype 
interpretations that can make this entailment.

Received on Tuesday, 16 December 2003 05:27:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:24:26 UTC