- From: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2003 13:07:54 +0000
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
I could sign up for this... I plan anyway to review this doc again, when it's stable. #g -- At 20:02 05/12/03 +0000, Brian McBride wrote: >Hi Folks, > >I would very much like to say yes to this. Can I have volunteers to draft >review comments on behalf of rdfcore please. > >Brian > > >-------- Original Message -------- >Subject: TAG Arch Doc LC review request >Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 15:32:17 -0000 >From: Williams, Stuart <skw@hp.com> >To: McBride, Brian <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org> >CC: 'tag@w3.org' <tag@w3.org> > >Brian, Dan, > >The TAG is working toward publishing a Last Call working draft of >"Architecture of the World Wide Web" [1], editors copy at [2]. I'd like >to solict a commitment from the RDF Core WG to review our LC draft once >published. We expect to announce a 3 month LC which we anticipate ending >around the time of the Tech Plenary in Cannes (or later if we fail to >meet our publication goals). Please could you let me know whether RDF >Core would be able to undertake a review within such a 3 month window. > >Best regards > >Stuart Williams >Tel: +44 117 3128285 > >[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch [latest WD] >[2] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/webarch [Editors copy - a living >document] ------------ Graham Klyne For email: http://www.ninebynine.org/#Contact
Received on Sunday, 7 December 2003 08:45:51 UTC