- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 11:14:22 +0100
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>, Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Actually in response to Patrick's latest on "pfps-06 on hold"
Choices may be:
1) Fudge - peter unhappy, can probably persuade WebOnt to be unhappy,
difficult to defend WG decision
2) LC design - Xerces implementors have difficulty in passing tests
3) LC design, remove test cases
Xerces implementors can pass all the tests may potential
interoperability issues swept under carpet
4) change design - Patrick unhappy, increased distance between RDF
datatyping and XML Schema Datatypes
5) Variant of Fudge - e.g. make it clear in the implemenation note that
additional whitespace is an error, make producing a warning a SHOULD rather
than a MAY. (Probably not enough to appease Peter, may head off others),
could even make the implementation note informative and down case the MAYs
and SHOULDs.
Jeremy
Received on Wednesday, 27 August 2003 06:35:09 UTC