- From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 15:40:55 +0300
- To: <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
> -----Original Message----- > From: ext Jeremy Carroll [mailto:jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com] > Sent: 20 August, 2003 16:52 > To: Stickler Patrick (NMP/Tampere) > Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > Subject: Re: On I18N issue - for cr request > > > 2. In your table at the end, it seems to me that the value for > > "[avoid] an RDF-specific solution [to the problem of] > XML [...] context" > > for "Normal Untyped Literal" and "Special typed literal" > should be "No", > > since for both, the form of expression of contextual > information is > > RDF-specific. ??? > > > > I believe those two options are adequately ruled out by other rows. > I think arguments could be made for Yes, and prefer to > concede those in > advance rather than be drawn towards a rathole. Fair enough. Patrick
Received on Saturday, 23 August 2003 06:05:09 UTC