RE: On I18N issue - for cr request



> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Jeremy Carroll [mailto:jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com]
> Sent: 20 August, 2003 16:52
> To: Stickler Patrick (NMP/Tampere)
> Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Re: On I18N issue - for cr request
> 

> > 2. In your table at the end, it seems to me that the value for
> >    "[avoid] an RDF-specific solution [to the problem of] 
> XML [...] context"
> >    for "Normal Untyped Literal" and "Special typed literal" 
> should be "No", 
> >    since for both, the form of expression of contextual 
> information is 
> >    RDF-specific.  ???
> > 
> 
> I believe those two options are adequately ruled out by other rows.
> I think arguments could be made for Yes, and prefer to 
> concede those in 
> advance rather than be drawn towards a rathole.

Fair enough.

Patrick

Received on Saturday, 23 August 2003 06:05:09 UTC