RE: On I18N issue - for cr request


Overall, looks great Jeremy.

A few questions:

1. In addition to changes related to octets, did we not also address
   the concerns brought forward by I18N about the nature of the
   value space of rdf:XMLLiteral, making clarifications to the
   definition of rdf:XMLLiteral to that end, as well as address
   the relationships between XML literals, plain literals without 
   lang tag, and xsd:string? (i.e. the idea of conversion versus equality)

2. In your table at the end, it seems to me that the value for
   "[avoid] an RDF-specific solution [to the problem of] XML [...] context"
   for "Normal Untyped Literal" and "Special typed literal" should be "No", 
   since for both, the form of expression of contextual information is 
   RDF-specific.  ???

Cheers,

Patrick

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Jeremy Carroll [mailto:jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com]
> Sent: 19 August, 2003 18:47
> To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
> Subject: On I18N issue - for cr request
> 
> 
> 
> Completing my action, see attached HTML.
> 
> Suggestions welcome.
> 
> Jeremy
>

Received on Saturday, 23 August 2003 06:03:22 UTC