- From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 10:39:46 +0100
- To: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org, Benja Fallenstein <b.fallenstein@gmx.de>, Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org, w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org, msm@w3.org
Preserving the thread, but answering just this point:
On Mon, 04 Aug 2003 10:55:01 -0400 Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org> wrote:
<snip/> [on A) "<br/"> canonicalization ]
> I agree that it would be a bad idea to try to provide an exc-C14N
> test suite. I think it would be good to add an example like this
> just to document how RDF/XML syntax, lexical value, and so on,
> are related, and in particular, that they are not exactly the same.
The RDF Core WG has agreed to add a test to the RDF Core testcases
on this point, canonicalizing "<br/>" as "<br></br>". My proposal in
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Aug/0061.html
was accepted and we chose option 1 which is as follows:
[[
input rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure/test006.rdf
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:eg="http://example.org/">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://example.org/foo">
<eg:bar rdf:parseType="Literal"><br/></eg:bar>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
output rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure/test006.nt
<http://example.org/foo> <http://example.org/bar> "<br></br>"^^<http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#XMLLiteral> .
]]
Dave
Received on Friday, 15 August 2003 05:42:59 UTC