Re: Conformance statement for an "RDF document"

On 24 Jul 2003 14:07:08 +0100
Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com> wrote:

> 
> Dave,
> 
> Thanks for this.  Looks good.  In interests of simplicity, I suggest
> omitting the "maybe add"'s, unless anyone puts up a strong case to
> include them.

I've added the conformance to the syntax WD editor's draft, new section 5.5
  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-syntax-grammar-20030117/#section-conformance

Dave

Received on Monday, 4 August 2003 10:29:44 UTC