- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2003 12:41:35 -0400
- To: pat hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
* pat hayes <phayes@ihmc.us> [2003-08-03 11:14-0500] > >RDFCore, > > > >We say that rdfs:member (the superproperty of rdf:_1, _2 etc) has an > >rdfs:domain of rdfs:Resource, allowing it to be applied to anything > >without implying that thing is a Container. > > > >I believe the text in > >http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-schema-20030117/#ch_member > >is perfectly consistent with that. *However* the rdfs:comment for > >rdfs:member says: > > > >"A member of the subject container." > > > >This is a bug (thanks to Roland Schwaenz for spotting it). We need a new > >and more non-commital rdfs:comment for this property. > > > >Creative suggests welcomed. In the absence of inspiration, I propose: > > > >rdfs:member, "A member of the subject resource." > > > >Admittedly this doesn't make much sense, but we don't give ourselves a > >great deal of space in our rdfs:label glosses to expand on detail. > > > >Any objections to running with the above proposal? > > OK with me. Done. Dan
Received on Sunday, 3 August 2003 12:41:35 UTC