- From: pat hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2003 11:14:12 -0500
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
>RDFCore, > >We say that rdfs:member (the superproperty of rdf:_1, _2 etc) has an >rdfs:domain of rdfs:Resource, allowing it to be applied to anything >without implying that thing is a Container. > >I believe the text in >http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-schema-20030117/#ch_member >is perfectly consistent with that. *However* the rdfs:comment for >rdfs:member says: > >"A member of the subject container." > >This is a bug (thanks to Roland Schwaenz for spotting it). We need a new >and more non-commital rdfs:comment for this property. > >Creative suggests welcomed. In the absence of inspiration, I propose: > >rdfs:member, "A member of the subject resource." > >Admittedly this doesn't make much sense, but we don't give ourselves a >great deal of space in our rdfs:label glosses to expand on detail. > >Any objections to running with the above proposal? OK with me. Pat -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32501 (850)291 0667 cell phayes@ihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Sunday, 3 August 2003 12:13:03 UTC