- From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 00:51:16 +0200
- To: "pat hayes <phayes" <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Cc: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org, w3c-rdfcore-wg-request@w3.org
[...]
>>That's more complicated than what I'm asking for.
>
>OK, I withdraw the suggestion. I agree it would be trivial to add
rdfs:fyi.
of course, I forgot what DanC suggested
no doubt, it is trivial to add rdfs:fyi
let's do that
we tested successfully with
rdfs:fyi rdfs:domain rdfs:Resource; rdfs:range rdfs:Resource.
and
{:rdf0} => {?S rdfs:fyi ?O}.
in http://www.agfa.com/w3c/euler/rdfs-rules
-- ,
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Monday, 28 April 2003 18:51:33 UTC