- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 21:35:36 +0300
- To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
> #owlref-rdfcore-rdfs:literal-not-a-datatype
> rdfs:Literal is not a datatype.
comment also applicable about S&AS where the problem is more serious ...
(The grammatical restrictions on rdfs:Literal in OWL DL are that it may appear
where a datatypeID may appear, except in a typed literal. However, OWL S&AS
allows
"aaa"^^rdfs:Literal
as well as
eg:p rdf:type owl:DatatypeProperty .
eg:p rdfs:range rdfs:Literal .
The first construction is probably harmless, since it is so obviously
incorrect.
> #owlref-rdfcore-enumerated-datatype-in-xml
> 6.2 Enumerated datatype
> We suggest the following form
inspired.
> #owlref-rdfcore-annotation-restriction
> 7.1 Annotations
The comment should be toned down, this is an editorial error. IIRC, the intent
is not to restrict annotation properties in OWL Full. The text does need
fixing.
> #owlref-rdfcore-transitive-datatype-properties
eg:lessThan rdf:type owl:TransitiveProperty .
eg:lessThan rdf:type owl:DatatypeProperty .
eg:lessThan rdfs:domain xsd:decimal .
eg:lessThan rdfs:range xsd:decimal .
_:sa eg:lessThan _:sb .
_:sb eg:lessThan _:sc .
_:sa owl:sameIndividualAs "9"^^xsd:int.
_:sc owl:sameIndividualAs "3"^^xsd:int .
is inconsistent.
Jeremy
Received on Sunday, 27 April 2003 16:07:37 UTC