- From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
- Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 01:22:59 +0200
- To: "Dan Brickley <danbri" <danbri@w3.org>
- Cc: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org, w3c-rdfcore-wg-request@w3.org
>> Can anyone tell me if we have decided this? >> >> Should the domains of rdf:_1, rdf:_2, etc., be rdfs:Container or >> rdfs:Resource? Peter tells me that email discussions about rdf:li >> say they should be the latter, ie. it is OK to apply these properties >> to non-containers. Is that right? >> >> Reply only if you actually know ;-) > >To the best of my knowledge, we didn't set a domain of rdfs:Container >for these properties. They're applicable to everything. I don't understand that; applying it to :aaa e.g. :aaa rdf:_987 :bbb. means that :aaa rdf:type rdfs:Container. If we say that it can be applied to everything, then we can apply it to rdf:nil, but what is the meaning of rdf:nil rdf:type rdfs:Container. ?? >This strikes me as useful: such an ugly set of properties shouldn't >be duplicated for other uses ;) -- , Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Saturday, 26 April 2003 19:23:15 UTC