- From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 11:22:56 +0100
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
>>>Dan Brickley said: > I thought TimBL's point was that the 'this is a List' statements could > be inferred through knowledge of the rdfs:domain of rdf:first and > rdf:rest. Anything familiar with the meaning of these rdf properties > will know that they can be truly applied only to lists. In that light, > forcing parsers to emit this data explicitly is indeed rather redundant. That was just one of the points, the owl semantics / lemmas / proofs use rdf:List. I can't say throw it out since I don't understand if they are required. My argument stands until somebody who does tells me that they are required/not required for these purposes too. Dave
Received on Thursday, 24 April 2003 06:24:21 UTC