- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 11:19:56 +0300
- To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Patrick: > Hmmm.... sorry, but I don't myself buy that explanation. Did you prefer Brian's text? - he talked about both literals as subjects and non-monotonicity. He certainly phrased it more gently, which is a good thing. My view is that the crucial test cases that determined the current design were ones like <jenny> age "10" . <film> title "10" . entails <jenny> age _:b . <film> title _:b . I was trying to indicate that without getting into detail. (Patrick both you and I disagreed with the WG decision on this test case; however, that does not mean that we cannot try and articulate why, having decided this test case, much of the rest falls into place. I would ceratinly agree that the WG could have gone the other way, and not had a monotonicity problem with global datatyping) Jeremy
Received on Wednesday, 23 April 2003 05:24:56 UTC