- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 15:29:23 +0100
- To: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
At 19:41 18/04/2003 -0500, pat hayes wrote: >>>Section 3.1, rdf:first, rdf:rest >>> >>>Would it not be appropriate to specify semantic conditions that IP contains >>>I(rdf:first), etc? >>> >>>Also, rdf:subject, rdf:predicate, rdf:object, rdf:_1, rdf:_2, ... , >>>rdf:value ? >> >>This is now done in the version at the URI, ie >> >>http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes/RDF_Semantics_Editors.html >> >>which also now has a new figure 2 to match. Ive re-worded the >>introductory paragraphs to section 3.2 to suit: mostly this is just >>cut-and-paste reordering of the old text. >> >>To the best of my knowledge, this is now pretty close to complete, and is >>modified to conform to all known comments, except for the needed changes >>to the appendices, on which I will be working for a few more days. The >>links and anchors still need a bit of work. >> >>Brian, if you could archive this into the W3C space as the current >>editor's draft that would be useful, then I can issue response emails to >>the various comments. Thanks. > >The version (dated 18b April) now at that URI has a modification to the >monotonicity lemma (plus surrounding text) in section 3.5 (it was formerly >in 3.4 and was wrong) , and has all the citations and RFC 2119 vocabulary >markup fixed to conform to the W3C style manual. Also Ive fixed an >obscure bug in the CSS style sheet, so the glossary links are now unobtrusive. Done - showing version 21a April 2003 - sorry for the delay. I updated the main document and fig 2 only. Brian
Received on Tuesday, 22 April 2003 10:35:36 UTC