W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > April 2003

Re: ACTION 2003-03-14#6: comments on semantics doc

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 15:29:23 +0100
Message-Id: <>
To: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org

At 19:41 18/04/2003 -0500, pat hayes wrote:
>>>Section 3.1, rdf:first, rdf:rest
>>>Would it not be appropriate to specify semantic conditions that IP contains
>>>I(rdf:first), etc?
>>>Also, rdf:subject, rdf:predicate, rdf:object, rdf:_1, rdf:_2, ... , 
>>>rdf:value ?
>>This is now done in the version at the URI, ie
>>which also now has a new figure 2 to match. Ive re-worded the 
>>introductory paragraphs to section 3.2 to suit: mostly this is just 
>>cut-and-paste reordering of the old text.
>>To the best of my knowledge, this is now pretty close to complete, and is 
>>modified to conform to all known comments, except for the needed changes 
>>to the appendices, on which I will be working for a few more days.  The 
>>links and anchors still need a bit of work.
>>Brian, if you could archive this into the W3C space as the current 
>>editor's draft that would be useful, then I can issue response emails to 
>>the various comments. Thanks.
>The version (dated 18b April) now at that URI has a modification to the 
>monotonicity lemma (plus surrounding text) in section 3.5 (it was formerly 
>in 3.4 and was wrong) , and has all the citations and RFC 2119 vocabulary 
>markup fixed to conform to the W3C style manual.  Also Ive fixed an 
>obscure bug in the CSS style sheet, so the glossary links are now unobtrusive.

Done - showing version 21a April 2003 - sorry for the delay.

I updated the main document and fig 2 only.

Received on Tuesday, 22 April 2003 10:35:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:24:22 UTC