W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > April 2003

Re: Proposed response for timbl-02 (reification semantics)

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 08:58:52 +0100
Message-ID: <3E95243C.20206@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
CC: Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com, bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com, gk@ninebynine.org, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org

> Since referencing sources, provenence and suchlike is a trust centric
> application area, I am wondering whether we should have a 'Security 
> Considerations' <blink/> tag in our health warning for reification. Maybe
> that's overkill, but I do worry that it is all too easy to read properties
> such as 'source' as saying something like 'these uris were used in this 
> rdf document'. I think the OWL machinery gives us a way of showing that
> not to be workable...

I could support 'Security  Considerations'

Received on Thursday, 10 April 2003 03:59:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:24:21 UTC