- From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2003 09:06:12 +0300
- To: <jjc@hpl.hp.com>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: ext Jeremy Carroll [mailto:jjc@hpl.hp.com] > Sent: 09 April, 2003 07:53 > To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > Subject: Concepts: pfps-14 Social Meaning & authority for datatypes > > > > > As part of the pfps-14 decision should we strike: > > [[ > The defining authority of a URI which identifies a datatype > is responsible > for specifying the datatype's lexical space, value space and datatype > mapping > ]] > from section 3.3 > http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-rdf-concepts-20030123/#section-Datatypes > > Jeremy I agree. This is incorrect, since one may mint a URI to denote a datatype that someone else has defined. Perhaps we should rather replace it with a statement akin to [[ The defining authority of a URI which identifies an rdfs:Datatype asserts that it has a lexical space, value space, and datatype mapping compatible with that defined by this specification. ]] Eh? Patrick
Received on Wednesday, 9 April 2003 02:06:22 UTC