- From: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 11:38:17 +0100
- To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
I think we decided to avoid specific reference to IRIs in the RDF spec, so this note is not significant except as a small additional datum. I note a TAG discussion that started a couple of weeks or so ago that suggests some confusion about using IRIs in specifications, starting with... http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Mar/0033.html (Later, Henry Thompson makes a comment concerning a "one step behind" guideline: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Mar/0037.html which is interesting in this context because the proposed IRI spec is, I understand, intended to be an RFC rather than W3C REC track specification.) #g ------------------- Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org> PGP: 0FAA 69FF C083 000B A2E9 A131 01B9 1C7A DBCA CB5E
Received on Monday, 7 April 2003 12:40:24 UTC