- From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 18:18:58 +0100
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
>>>Brian McBride said:
> Sure; please can we have proposed resolution text to consider.
I propose that the WG reject chas-01 "request to add aboutEachPrefix"
on the grounds that the original reasons for removal remain valid:
* We had good feedback that it lived badly in RDF and as such
was little implemented or used.
* It broke layering by looking inside URIs rather than dealing with
them as identifiers.
* Felt more like a RDF/XML syntax thing than part of the RDF model
and as such it mixed badly with triples.
* Worked badly with rdf:bagID - the interactions were never well
understood.
* Experienced practitioners recommended against using it.
Dave
Received on Wednesday, 2 April 2003 12:19:30 UTC