- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 13:47:52 +0100
- To: Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
- CC: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
I will try and avoid getting into a long procedural discussion and just continue with two detailed points ... Jeremy: >> I am at a lost to see why the section title changed, why a new >> paragraph on >> Clark Kent appeared, etc. etc. > > Graham Klyne wrote: > The new paragraphs were additional elements in response to issues > macgregor-01, macgregor-02. Maybe they're unnecessary, but I was trying > to respond to the spirit of the issues raised as well as the letter of > the issue resolution. I felt the WG resolutions were clear - we were going to say less because what we had said was inadequate and we didn't have enough effort left to say it well. Hence I find it unaceptable to say more. I am not an expert on proposotional attitudes etc. but I saw this new text and assumed that at least some of the people who are would find it unacceptable. Adding it seems to go against what I understood as the WG position which is a recognition that we wanted to stay clear of some philosophical minefields. > As for the section title changes, I viewed these were editorial > refinements that reflected the change of emphasis of the section contents. > > >> For instance, the change in the section title breaks W3C guidelines on >> case, >> and so one of the reviewers who was fairly positive would be less so now. > > > Oh, grumble. That change may have been wrong to make, but the > capitalization of section headings is something that grates quite > severely on me. My point here is not that capitalization is good - but simply that the documents have been reviewed as is, and while not wanting to freeze them as they were at LC I would like to see process in which changes are made explicit on the list - having said this, I realise that semantics has needed a bigger overhaul than that - but I hope the other documents are not getting changed more than is apparent in the e-mail traffic. Jeremy
Received on Wednesday, 2 April 2003 07:48:22 UTC