- From: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 11:03:52 -0600
- To: Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
>At 03:12 PM 12/15/02 -0600, pat hayes wrote: >>@@I would like us to have this stated explicitly somewhere, and the >>concepts doc is the obvious place. Hint, hint?? This is actually >>quite timely, as there is mounting political pressure (mostly from >>the RuleML folk) to insert highly nonmonotonic extensions into the >>webont mix, and I'd like us to lock down the point that anything >>non-mon is not an RDF semantic extension. > >I'm sympathetic, but we're locked down for last-call-candidate >review, and this doesn't seem critical. I think it is cirtical that we as a group say this clearly *somewhere*. >I guess we could this as a comment to consider along with other WG >LCC comments? Sure. Pat -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32501 (850)291 0667 cell phayes@ai.uwf.edu http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes s.pam@ai.uwf.edu for spam
Received on Monday, 16 December 2002 12:03:57 UTC