- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 16 Dec 2002 10:35:31 -0600
- To: Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
- Cc: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
On Sat, 2002-12-14 at 07:28, Graham Klyne wrote: > Does removing the UTF-8 encoding para > satisfy your concern here? Yes. > At 05:02 PM 12/13/02 -0600, Dan Connolly wrote: > > >Jeremy, > > > >In 3. XML Content within an RDF Graph (Normative) > > > >http://sealpc09.cnuce.cnr.it/jeremy/RDF-concepts/20021121/Overview.html#section-Literals > >Thu, 21 Nov 2002 22:50:34 GMT > > Do you mean: > http://sealpc09.cnuce.cnr.it/jeremy/RDF-concepts/20021121/Overview.html#section-XMLLiteral > ? > > > >I see: > > > >"Encode the resulting Unicode string in UTF-8 to form the corresponding > >XML document." > > > >but XML documents are character sequences, > >not byte sequences. > > Oh yes, I missed that. I think that para can be struck. > > > >http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml#sec-well-formed > > > >Er... actually, there might be more than > >one entity in a document, in which case > >it's not clear that the whole thing is > >one character sequence. > > > >Ugh... maybe it's not clear what an > >XML document is. But I don't see how > >UTF-8 is relevant to the definition > >you gave. > > > >I suggest taking it out. > > I don't think I understand all that. Does removing the UTF-8 encoding para > satisfy your concern here? > > #g > > > ------------------- > Graham Klyne > <GK@NineByNine.org> -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Monday, 16 December 2002 11:37:21 UTC