- From: Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
- Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2002 13:28:48 +0000
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
At 05:02 PM 12/13/02 -0600, Dan Connolly wrote: >Jeremy, > >In 3. XML Content within an RDF Graph (Normative) > >http://sealpc09.cnuce.cnr.it/jeremy/RDF-concepts/20021121/Overview.html#section-Literals >Thu, 21 Nov 2002 22:50:34 GMT Do you mean: http://sealpc09.cnuce.cnr.it/jeremy/RDF-concepts/20021121/Overview.html#section-XMLLiteral ? >I see: > >"Encode the resulting Unicode string in UTF-8 to form the corresponding >XML document." > >but XML documents are character sequences, >not byte sequences. Oh yes, I missed that. I think that para can be struck. >http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml#sec-well-formed > >Er... actually, there might be more than >one entity in a document, in which case >it's not clear that the whole thing is >one character sequence. > >Ugh... maybe it's not clear what an >XML document is. But I don't see how >UTF-8 is relevant to the definition >you gave. > >I suggest taking it out. I don't think I understand all that. Does removing the UTF-8 encoding para satisfy your concern here? #g ------------------- Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
Received on Sunday, 15 December 2002 05:55:41 UTC