- From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 10:36:53 +0200
- To: "ext pat hayes" <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Cc: <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Sounds good to me. Patrick [Patrick Stickler, Nokia/Finland, (+358 40) 801 9690, patrick.stickler@nokia.com] ----- Original Message ----- From: "ext pat hayes" <phayes@ai.uwf.edu> To: "Patrick Stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com> Cc: <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org> Sent: 13 December, 2002 18:11 Subject: Re: What are literals? > >[Patrick Stickler, Nokia/Finland, (+358 40) 801 9690, > >patrick.stickler@nokia.com] > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "ext Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com> > >To: "pat hayes" <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>; "Patrick Stickler" > ><patrick.stickler@nokia.com>; <danbri+rdfs@w3.org> > >Cc: <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org> > >Sent: 12 December, 2002 18:53 > >Subject: Re: What are literals? > > > > > >> At 10:11 12/12/2002 -0600, pat hayes wrote: > >> > >> [...] > >> > >> > >> >Yes, this text has my mind reeling. My understanding of the reification > >> >vocabulary was that the rdf:subject and rdf:object of a reified triple > >> >were the things that the subject and object of the original triple > >> >denoted. In which case the rdf:object is always a literal VALUE rather > >> >than the literal itself, so yes, indeed, it can be said to be in > >> >rdfs:Resource. So the range is rdfs:Resource, and this should be altered. > >> > >> The vocab doc needs work. It will get it. Stick to what we have decided > >> and expect it to come into line. > > > >Right. The point was simply to confirm that we all agree that > > > > rdfs:Literal rdfs:subClassOf rdfs:Resource . > > > >and secondly, if that's the case, that perhaps the MT should say > >so explicitly. > > There is now a sentence about subsets of rdfs:Resource generally, in > section 3.3: > > -------- > Since ICEXT(I(rdfs:Resource)) is the universe, everything has > rdfs:Resource as an rdf:type value, and every class is a subclass of > rdfs:Resource.Such assertions would be redundant, therefore. > > Similarly, some domain and range assertions are omitted from the > above table; in those cases, the domain or range of the property may > be taken to be rdfs:Resource, i.e. the universe; such range and > domain assertions are essentially vacuous. > --------- > > Pat > -- > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > IHMC (850)434 8903 home > 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office > Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax > FL 32501 (850)291 0667 cell > phayes@ai.uwf.edu http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes > s.pam@ai.uwf.edu for spam >
Received on Monday, 16 December 2002 03:42:17 UTC