- From: <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 17:05:52 GMT
- To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Time:
10:00:00 Fri Dec 06 2002 in America/New York duration 60+30 minutes
which is equivalent to
15:00:00 Fri Dec 06 2002 in Europe/London
Phone: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim)#7332
irc: irc.w3.org #rdfcore
1: Scribes
Jeremy this week?
Volunteer to scribe next
2: Roll Call
3: Review Agenda
4: Next telecon 13th Dec 2002
Thanks Giving?
5: Minutes of 2002-11-2 telecon
See:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Nov/0611.html
6: Confirm Status of Completed Actions
ACTION: 2002-02-25#21 EricM
Ensure M&S has an erratum to say the M&S will be superceded by new documents
see:
http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-rdf-syntax-19990222/errata
ACTION: 2002-04-26#5 Eric
get IPR statements link in place by April 30
see:
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/ipr-statements
ACTION: 2002-05-03#1 bwm
review charter over rdfms-charmod-uri resolution
ACTION: 2002-11-08#5 jjc
Jeremy Carroll: write up boilerplate to define URIRef with the special RDF meaning
see:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Nov/0558.html
7: Primer
2002-04-19#16 danbri review effect of containerMembershipProperty superproperty on primer
2002-05-03#4 em liase with danbri to ensure primer and schema stay in sync over the isDefinedBy issue
Latest ed's version I have is:
http://www.w3.org/2001/09/rdfprimer/rdf-primer-20021124.html
Status. Issues.
8: Concepts Doc
2002-11-22#5 jjc check that RDF Concepts does not allow a synonym for
rdf:XMLLiteral
Status.
The latest ed's WD pointer I have is:
http://sealpc09.cnuce.cnr.it/jeremy/RDF-concepts/20021121/Overview.html
Issue: The 'clown' example - using third party vocabularies
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Dec/0023.html
This looks to be pretty well worked out.
Definition of blank node
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Nov/0650.html
Is this resolved? Ed's: please try to come to telecon with issue resolved.
9: Semantics Doc
2002-11-22#3 patH Tie MT datatype to the sec that points out language
isn't important to DT entailment (except for
rdf:XMLLiteral)
2002-11-22#6 danc review RDF Semantics, with a particular view to
"define a language, not a software spec"
Status.
Latest ed's WD url:
http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes/RDF_Semantics_finalCall.html
a url I find encouragingly named.
Issues:
Whether to include the xsd datatypes ontology.
10: Syntax Document
Status
Issues
Canonicalization wording
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Nov/0649.html
11: Schema
2002-06-17#1 danbri Update RDFS spec to reflect resolution of
rdfms-seq-representation
2002-06-17#5 danbri Update the schema spec to reflect the resolution of
rdfs-isDefinedBy.
2002-06-17#7 danbri Update the schema spec to account for editorial issues
listed under rdfs-editorial.
2002-06-18#1 danbri republish the current rdf schema to the current rdf
schema uri
2002-07-12#6 danbri try to move sec 5 to schema doc
2002-09-13#3 Danbri update schema to cover 2.1, 3.1, 3.2, 5 to reflect
datatype concensus
2002-11-01#14 danbri Contact jjc/gk to ask them to review schema draft
Status.
This doc isn't ready. I've had the lock and not been able to get to it.
12: Testcases
2001-10-26-#1 bwm make a test case to illustrate set/bag decision
2002-02-25#9 JanG Ensure test cases for rdf:foo added to test cases WD
2002-04-05#5 Jeremy write test cases for rdfms-xml-literal-namespaces
2002-04-19#14 danc do entailement test case for container with rdfs:contains
2002-04-19#18 jan produce test case for rdfs-subClassOf-a-Property
2002-06-07#3 JanG Fold in the consensus test cases and bring back the rest to the group
2002-06-07#4 JanG Update the test case problems reported by JeremyC and DaveB
2002-05-31#3 JanG Update test case document with tests for parseType collection
2002-09-13#6 Jan create testcase to reflect datatype concensus
2002-09-20#1 jjc Produce test case domain and range.
2002-10-11#1 janG add test cases from msg Oct/0098
2002-11-01#11 DanC Create test cases for non datatyped simple literals
Status. Issues.
See:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Nov/0447.html
13: LBase Document
2002-11-01#16 danbri team contact for publishinging LBase note
Status?
See:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2002Oct/0046.html
14: The last deliverable
We still have to decide what to do about the RDFCore deliverable:
* provide an account of the relationship between RDF and the XML
family of technologies (particularly Schemas and Infoset/Query)
We need to figure out if/how we meet this deliverable.
See:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Nov/0473.html
15: Schedule
See:
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/#microschedule
16: Publication Process
See:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Nov/0518.html
------------------------------------------------------------
This agenda was produced by Jema, the Jena WG assistant
Received on Thursday, 5 December 2002 12:06:01 UTC