- From: <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 17:05:52 GMT
- To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Time: 10:00:00 Fri Dec 06 2002 in America/New York duration 60+30 minutes which is equivalent to 15:00:00 Fri Dec 06 2002 in Europe/London Phone: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim)#7332 irc: irc.w3.org #rdfcore 1: Scribes Jeremy this week? Volunteer to scribe next 2: Roll Call 3: Review Agenda 4: Next telecon 13th Dec 2002 Thanks Giving? 5: Minutes of 2002-11-2 telecon See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Nov/0611.html 6: Confirm Status of Completed Actions ACTION: 2002-02-25#21 EricM Ensure M&S has an erratum to say the M&S will be superceded by new documents see: http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-rdf-syntax-19990222/errata ACTION: 2002-04-26#5 Eric get IPR statements link in place by April 30 see: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/ipr-statements ACTION: 2002-05-03#1 bwm review charter over rdfms-charmod-uri resolution ACTION: 2002-11-08#5 jjc Jeremy Carroll: write up boilerplate to define URIRef with the special RDF meaning see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Nov/0558.html 7: Primer 2002-04-19#16 danbri review effect of containerMembershipProperty superproperty on primer 2002-05-03#4 em liase with danbri to ensure primer and schema stay in sync over the isDefinedBy issue Latest ed's version I have is: http://www.w3.org/2001/09/rdfprimer/rdf-primer-20021124.html Status. Issues. 8: Concepts Doc 2002-11-22#5 jjc check that RDF Concepts does not allow a synonym for rdf:XMLLiteral Status. The latest ed's WD pointer I have is: http://sealpc09.cnuce.cnr.it/jeremy/RDF-concepts/20021121/Overview.html Issue: The 'clown' example - using third party vocabularies http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Dec/0023.html This looks to be pretty well worked out. Definition of blank node http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Nov/0650.html Is this resolved? Ed's: please try to come to telecon with issue resolved. 9: Semantics Doc 2002-11-22#3 patH Tie MT datatype to the sec that points out language isn't important to DT entailment (except for rdf:XMLLiteral) 2002-11-22#6 danc review RDF Semantics, with a particular view to "define a language, not a software spec" Status. Latest ed's WD url: http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes/RDF_Semantics_finalCall.html a url I find encouragingly named. Issues: Whether to include the xsd datatypes ontology. 10: Syntax Document Status Issues Canonicalization wording http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Nov/0649.html 11: Schema 2002-06-17#1 danbri Update RDFS spec to reflect resolution of rdfms-seq-representation 2002-06-17#5 danbri Update the schema spec to reflect the resolution of rdfs-isDefinedBy. 2002-06-17#7 danbri Update the schema spec to account for editorial issues listed under rdfs-editorial. 2002-06-18#1 danbri republish the current rdf schema to the current rdf schema uri 2002-07-12#6 danbri try to move sec 5 to schema doc 2002-09-13#3 Danbri update schema to cover 2.1, 3.1, 3.2, 5 to reflect datatype concensus 2002-11-01#14 danbri Contact jjc/gk to ask them to review schema draft Status. This doc isn't ready. I've had the lock and not been able to get to it. 12: Testcases 2001-10-26-#1 bwm make a test case to illustrate set/bag decision 2002-02-25#9 JanG Ensure test cases for rdf:foo added to test cases WD 2002-04-05#5 Jeremy write test cases for rdfms-xml-literal-namespaces 2002-04-19#14 danc do entailement test case for container with rdfs:contains 2002-04-19#18 jan produce test case for rdfs-subClassOf-a-Property 2002-06-07#3 JanG Fold in the consensus test cases and bring back the rest to the group 2002-06-07#4 JanG Update the test case problems reported by JeremyC and DaveB 2002-05-31#3 JanG Update test case document with tests for parseType collection 2002-09-13#6 Jan create testcase to reflect datatype concensus 2002-09-20#1 jjc Produce test case domain and range. 2002-10-11#1 janG add test cases from msg Oct/0098 2002-11-01#11 DanC Create test cases for non datatyped simple literals Status. Issues. See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Nov/0447.html 13: LBase Document 2002-11-01#16 danbri team contact for publishinging LBase note Status? See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2002Oct/0046.html 14: The last deliverable We still have to decide what to do about the RDFCore deliverable: * provide an account of the relationship between RDF and the XML family of technologies (particularly Schemas and Infoset/Query) We need to figure out if/how we meet this deliverable. See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Nov/0473.html 15: Schedule See: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/#microschedule 16: Publication Process See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Nov/0518.html ------------------------------------------------------------ This agenda was produced by Jema, the Jena WG assistant
Received on Thursday, 5 December 2002 12:06:01 UTC