Re: Issue rdfms-abouteach from Dave Beckett on 2001-11-16 (w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org from November 2001)

From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 13:42:43 +0000
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, "Patrick.Stickler" <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
Message-ID: <22406.1005918163@tatooine.ilrt.bris.ac.uk>

>>>Dan Brickley said:
> Thanks Patrick; much appreciated. Something we could do next, *if* we do
> decide to remove the construct from our next Working Draft, is propagate
> this up to the Semantic Web Coordination Group and ask that the Web
> Ontology WG take this (ie. some improved/equivalent functionality) on
> board as a design requirement or use case for their Web Ontology language.

I'd support and recommend that.  As I was probably hinting but not
saying clear enough, aboutEach really looks much better as a concept
on top of RDF, more in the rules area.

Dave

Received on Friday, 16 November 2001 08:42:44 UTC