- From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 15:54:54 +0000
- To: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: "Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "rdf core" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
At 02:50 PM 11/15/01 +0000, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
>+ there are a number of adequate fixes with adequate backwardly compatible
>behaviour. Viz -
> a. mandate that all fragment URIs of a particular URI are in fact bNode's
>and not real URIs e.g. http://www.w3.org/2001/11/rdf/bnode#b1
>
> b. suggest use of processing instruction
> e.g. <?rdf-fake-uri http://www.w3.org/2001/11/rdf/bnode?>
>
> c. use of new attribute rdf:local
>
>
>
>Anyone care to push me over the edge?
I'm not going to push one way or the other; I understand the attraction of
fixing this, but I also understand the charter has a purpose.
BUT, if we do decide to fix this, I don't like solution (a) or (b).
However, something like:
<rdf:Description rdf:local="node"> ...
:
<ex:property rdf:local="node" />
seems quite regular and OK. Also, it suggests, if needed:
<rdf:Description rdf:local="node" rdf:literal="literalchars"> ...
:
<ex:property rdf:local="node">literalchars</ex:property>
#g
------------------------------------------------------------
Graham Klyne MIMEsweeper Group
Strategic Research <http://www.mimesweeper.com>
<Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
__
/\ \
/ \ \
/ /\ \ \
/ / /\ \ \
/ / /__\_\ \
/ / /________\
\/___________/
Received on Thursday, 15 November 2001 11:27:39 UTC