- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2001 16:36:30 +0000
- To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- CC: rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Dave Beckett wrote: [...] > > No. This is requiring a processor has an option in handling RDF/XML, > and I don't want to start doing that without a good reason (this is > the first time optional RDF/XML processing has come up). > > Proposal: > The WG resolves that a parser MUST emit statements describing a > bag of reifed statements when an rdf:bagID attribute is present > on the rdf:Description (or typed node) element. It MUST NOT > emit bags of reified statements for rdf:Description (or typed > node) elements without rdf:bagID attributes. > > I don't think we can decide this tomorrow since there are no test > cases. However, the current draft description for this bit of syntax > http://ilrt.org/discovery/2001/07/rdf-syntax-grammar/#nodeElement > describes the triple-production in the above way. OK - needs more dicsussion. Its off tomorrows list. Brian
Received on Thursday, 8 November 2001 11:41:07 UTC