>>>Brian McBride said: > I received the following comment on the proposed resolution of > rdfms-reification -required from Wolfram: <snip/> > In the light of this comment, I've modified the proposed resolution: > > Proposal: > The WG resolves that a parser is not required to always emit statements > representing a bag of reified statements for each Description > element. A parser SHOULD emit statements describing a bag of reifed > statements when an rdf:bagID is present in the description element. > It SHOULD be possible to instruct a parser to emit bags of > reified statements for all description elements. No. This is requiring a processor has an option in handling RDF/XML, and I don't want to start doing that without a good reason (this is the first time optional RDF/XML processing has come up). Proposal: The WG resolves that a parser MUST emit statements describing a bag of reifed statements when an rdf:bagID attribute is present on the rdf:Description (or typed node) element. It MUST NOT emit bags of reified statements for rdf:Description (or typed node) elements without rdf:bagID attributes. I don't think we can decide this tomorrow since there are no test cases. However, the current draft description for this bit of syntax http://ilrt.org/discovery/2001/07/rdf-syntax-grammar/#nodeElement describes the triple-production in the above way. DaveReceived on Thursday, 8 November 2001 11:33:41 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:24:06 UTC