- From: <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 15:16:54 GMT
- To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Time: 10:00:00 Fri Nov 09 2001 in America/New York which is equivalent to 15:00:00 Fri Nov 09 2001 in Europe/London 00:00:00 Sat Nov 10 2001 in Asia/Seoul Phone: +1 630 536 3003 room #3003 irc: irc.openprojects.net #rdfcore 1: Allocate scribe 2: Roll Call 3: Review Agenda 4: Next telecon - 10am Boston time, 16th Nov 2001 5: Review Minutes of 2001-10-26 with corrections See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Oct/0581.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Oct/0582.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Oct/0595.html 6: Review Minutes of 2001-11-02 with corrections See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Nov/0036.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Nov/0043.html 7: Welcome Patrick Stickler 8: Call for WG members who are not actively participating in WG business to contact the chairs. 9: Confirm Status of Completed Actions ACTION: 2001-08-02#7 Dave Beckett With help from Art and Jan, investigate how to represent RDF/XML grammar and the specification of the transformation of RDF/XML to a graph representation. see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Oct/0576.html ACTION: 2001-09-28#7 Jan Grant Remove xml:base from test cases see: http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-empty-property-elements/test011.rdf see: http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-empty-property-elements/test012.rdf ACTION: 2001-10-19#1 DaveB ensure there is a syntax document issue dealing with unrecognized attributes in the RDF namespace. see: http://ilrt.org/discovery/2001/07/rdf-syntax-grammar/ ACTION: 2001-10-19#9 DanBri Propose resolution of constraint resources for 26/10/2001 see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Oct/0575.html ACTION: 2001-10-19#10 DanBri Propose resolution of constraint properties for 26/10/2001 see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Oct/0575.html ACTION: 2001-10-19#11 Sergey post text attempting to state the two datatyping options, ASAP ACTION: 2001-10-26#2 aaron write up objections to postponing issues see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Oct/0580.html ACTION: 2001-11-02#2 Graham Extract datatype use cases from CCPP. see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Nov/0072.html 10: Withdraw the following actions ACTION: 2000-07-20#10 Eric Miller For 2001-07-20 minutes re character-encoding issue, to write up his correction and send to list. ACTION: 2001-10-19#4 ArtB Extract text from Jos to update Test Cases WD 11: Propose the WG approves publication of a new testscases WD See: http://www.w3.org/2001/08/rdf-test/ 12: Brief update on Primer status 13: Status status of 2001-10-19#2 JanG produce proposal on Entailment tests and test Manifest for 26/10/2001 14: Datatyping status and plans In particular the chair would like a schedule for producing the proposed document and to ask what resources (e.g. telecon facilities) this team requires. 15: Issue rdfs-constraint-properties-resources Propose that the WG resolve: The current mechanism, rdfs:ConstraintResource and rdfs:ConstraintProperty, fails to serve its original purpose and should be removed from the RDF Schema 1.0 specification. The accompanying text be amended accordingly. See: http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfs-constraint-properties-resources http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Oct/0575.html 16: Issue rdfms-resource-semantics Propose the WG close rdfms-resource-semantics on the grounds that the model theory says all that RDF is going to say about the nature of resources. Further specification of the nature of resources is the work of other WG's. See: http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-resource-semantics 17: Issue rdf-equivalent-uris Whilst the WG recognises the importance of a mechanism for defining equivalence of URI's, the WG has decided it does not fit within the limited scope of its current charter. The WG notes that DAML+OIL has an equivalence mechanism which raises the question of which layer of the stack best suits such functionality. The WG also notes that by allowing cycles in rdfs:subPropertyOf and rdfs:subClassOf RDF Schema provides a related mechanism for properties and classes. See: http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-equivalent-uris 18: Issue rdf-containers-otherapproaches Propose the WG postpone rdf-containers-otherapproaches on the grounds that it is out of scope of the WG's current charter. See: http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-containers-otherapproaches 19: Issue rdfms-logical-formalism Propose the WG close rdfms-logical-formalism on the grounds that the model theory adequately addresses this issue. See: http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-logical-formalism 20: Issue rdfms-logical-terminololgy Propose the WG close rdfms-logical-terminololgy on the grounds that the new terminology introduced by the model theory adequately addresses this issue. See: http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-logical-terminology 21: Issue rdfms-reification-required Propose The WG resolves that a parser is not required to always emit statements representing a bag of reified statements for each Description element. A parser SHOULD emit statements describing a bag of reifed statements when an rdf:bagID is present in the description element. It SHOULD be possible to instruct a parser to emit bags of reified statements for all description elements. See: http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-reification-required 22: Issue rdfms-validating-embedded-rdf Propose The WG resolves to postpone rdfms-validating-embedded-rdf for later consideration on the grounds that it is out of scope of its current charter to change the current RDF/XML syntax to the extent necessary to address it. The WG notes however that validation may be helped with various submitted (non-normative) XML schemas for RDF/XML pointed to at present in the editors draft at http://ilrt.org/discovery/2001/07/rdf-syntax-grammar/#section-Schemas See: http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-validating-embedded-rdf 23: Thanks and Farewell to Art ------------------------------------------------------------ This agenda was produced by Jema, the Jena WG assistant
Received on Thursday, 8 November 2001 10:17:43 UTC