- From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
- Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2001 17:55:19 +0000
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
At 08:59 AM 11/7/01 -0600, Dan Connolly wrote: > > In which case, I think you're flying in the face of existing RDF > > practice. > >Well, yes, I'm aware that folks say things like > the string "Dan Connolly" wrote a mail message >and I hope we can show/convince folks that this is >not a good idea. I think it's fine to educate people that it's not a good idea, but with the current understanding and use of RDF I think we should allow it to be legitimate RDF which *can* be interpreted as the designers intended. I think it's a fair trade-off that a fully-generic RDF processor (reasoner?) cannot access the intended meaning without supplying some additional information, which may be awkward to do. So the statememt: <http://www.ninebynine.org/> dc:creator "Graham Klyne" . should be allowed to be consistent with: <http://www.ninebynine.org/> dc:creator [ a foaf:Person ; foaf:name "Graham Klyne" ] . even if it doesn't, of itself, convey the same information. #g ------------------------------------------------------------ Graham Klyne MIMEsweeper Group Strategic Research <http://www.mimesweeper.com> <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com> ------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Wednesday, 7 November 2001 16:12:09 UTC