Re: Proposed issue resolutions (rdf-equivalent-uris)

>Pat Hayes wrote:
>>
>>  >On Monday, November 5, 2001, at 12:12  PM, Brian McBride wrote:
>>  >
>>  >>   http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-equivalent-uris
>>  >>
>>  >>on the grounds that it is out of scope of the charter.
>>  >
>>  >Umm, it was my understanding that subPropertyOf allowed one to
>>  >define two resources as equivalent by doing:
>>  >
>>  >foo rdfs:subPropertyOf bar .
>>  >bar rdfs:subPropertyOf foo .
>>  >
>>  >Is this not true?
>>
>>  Well caught, Aaron.
>
>Er... hang on... that doesn't allow you to conclude that
>foo = bar; it allows you conclude that they have the
>same members (i.e. same IEXT), but not the same, say, color.
>

True, true. (Eats crow....)

Pat
-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC					(850)434 8903   home
40 South Alcaniz St.			(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola,  FL 32501			(850)202 4440   fax
phayes@ai.uwf.edu 
http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes

Received on Wednesday, 7 November 2001 15:35:58 UTC