Re: Proposed issue resolutions (rdf-equivalent-uris)

Pat Hayes wrote:
> 
> >On Monday, November 5, 2001, at 12:12  PM, Brian McBride wrote:
> >
> >>   http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-equivalent-uris
> >>
> >>on the grounds that it is out of scope of the charter.
> >
> >Umm, it was my understanding that subPropertyOf allowed one to
> >define two resources as equivalent by doing:
> >
> >foo rdfs:subPropertyOf bar .
> >bar rdfs:subPropertyOf foo .
> >
> >Is this not true?
> 
> Well caught, Aaron.

Er... hang on... that doesn't allow you to conclude that
foo = bar; it allows you conclude that they have the
same members (i.e. same IEXT), but not the same, say, color.


[next time, Mr. Chair, please consider sending each proposed
resolution in a separate message.]

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/

Received on Wednesday, 7 November 2001 09:02:55 UTC