- From: Graham Klyne <GK-lists@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Sun, 06 May 2001 15:59:59 +0100
- To: Art Barstow <barstow@w3.org>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
At 09:30 AM 4/25/01 -0400, Art Barstow wrote: >On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 08:22:23AM -0500, Aaron Swartz wrote: > > Re: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Apr/0047.html > > > > > [[ > > > All elements and attributes in RDF must be namespace qualified > > > ]] > > > > What is the reasoning for "all elements" being part of this requirement? > > Many current RDF documents use default namespaces properly to default > > elements. Is there a reason for disqualifying this practice? > >Perhaps something like: > > [[ > Unqualified elements and attributes in RDF are discouraged > ]] > >would be better. Hmmm... sounds like a fudge to me. If there is a problem with unqualified attributes, then I think we'd do better to disallow them; (maybe use language like "... MUST generate namespace qualifiers, but MAY/SHOULD recognize unqualified attributes"?) #g
Received on Monday, 7 May 2001 11:59:49 UTC