- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 20:14:24 +0100
- To: rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
I have reviewed the responses to the proposed partitioning of our problem space, and I'd like to take a shot at summing up (not summarizing) the results. There seems to unanimity in the responses for a partition of the technical issues into: o an abstract syntax and semantics (previously called core) o schema o vocabularies o RDF/XML syntax There is some disagreement over what must be explicity dealt with in the abstract syntax and semantics, specifically, whether it must have explicit representation for reification, for type and for Class. Ron made the excellent point, that before we go off creating new designs, we ought to be clear what our requirements are. I suggest that there is enough agreement around this broad partitioning, that with the specific proviso that we remain open minded for the moment about where reification, type and class belong, that we can start to move forward with each partition in parallel. Brian
Received on Thursday, 21 June 2001 15:16:16 UTC