- From: <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 17:30:33 +0100
- To: bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Hi Brian, you wrote: >We have our first face to face meeting coming up in just a few weeks. >Personally, I am looking forward to the chance to meet everyone and >exchange a few beers. (I have a penchant for Sierra Nevada and >Anchor Steam.) Fine, and I hope they have 'triple' Trapist beer... >Face to face time is rare and extremely valuable. We should take care to >make the most of this opportunity. So as well as making sure we have some >fun, I would like to suggest that we set ourselves some goals for things >we'd like to accomplish by the end of the face to face. > >To initiate the discussion of what those goals might be, I'd like to >suggesting the following: > >That by the end of the face to face we have: > > o agreed an abstract syntax with at least the expressive power of > n-triple and defined its semantics > > o resolved all outstanding issues with RDF schema > > o decided how we will define RDF/XML (BNF, XML Schema?, DTD?, other) > and its transformation (XSLT, other?) to n-triple > >and within two weeks of the end of the face to face we have documented the >first two of these decisions in WG drafts. That would be really great! I find your testcase http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema/test004.rdf and it's desired n-triples result http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema/test004.nt very helpful in thinking about r9n (r+9letters+n) and I'm trying to work out some 'rules' examples. -- Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Thursday, 21 June 2001 11:32:44 UTC