- From: <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 10:19:44 +0100
- To: fmanola@mitre.org
- Cc: bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Frank wrote: [...] > "There exists a [resource] x such that name(x, Ora Lassila) and email(x, > lassila@w3.org) and creator(http://www.w3.org/Home/Lassila, x) and > URI(x, http://www.w3.org/staffid/85740) > > which simply adds the additional piece of information. > > What I've just said is based on the interpretation of RDF as making > statements in an EC logic; but any quantification is *implicit* (so is > the conjunction). I think that's the only sense in which we have > quantification in RDF. We don't have *explicit* existential > quantification (Sergey noted, and I agree, that this would be out of > scope), and we don't have universal quantification in any form. I think I agree with that, and we have experimented with *implicit* existential quantification of N-triples at http://vam969.roam.agfa.be/euler/index.html#26.078 and think that it might work... e.g. for the N-triples in http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema/test001.nt ////////// _:bag <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type> <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#Bag> . _:bag <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#_1> "1" . _:bag <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#_2> "2" . \\\\\\\\\\ we now have the following (outside-core) N3 ////////// @prefix log: <http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/log#>. this <http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/log#forSome> [ <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type> <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#Bag>; <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#_1> "1"; <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#_2> "2"]. \\\\\\\\\\ -- Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Monday, 18 June 2001 04:23:34 UTC