- From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com>
- Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 20:35:29 +0100
- To: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@upclink.com>
- Cc: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
At 03:35 PM 6/15/01 -0500, Aaron Swartz wrote: >On Friday, June 15, 2001, at 02:33 PM, Dan Connolly wrote: > >>And as Roy Fielding pointed out, RFC2396 itself >>uses 'resource' only in the stricter sense; >>he (among others) haven't bought in to the >>way the RDF spec uses the term. > >I think you are misrepresenting the issue. The issue is not that resource >is only used in the stricter sense (in fact, the URI RFC makes it clear >that resources can be anything "with identity"). The problem is that >URI-refs (URIs plus fragments) are not defined to represent or relate to >resources in any ways. > >Roy and others were aware of this problem at the time they drafted the >spec -- they did it on purpose. It's a feature, not a bug. The problems is >that if you allow fragments to represent resources, you run into all sorts >of problems (many of which RDF is already experiencing). > >RDF needs to reconcile itself with web architecture somehow, and I feel >that this is a serious issue for the Working Group to address. > >I wrote up a summary of the issue at: >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2001May/0137.html When I raised this issue in the RDFIG session of the W3C tech plenary earlier this year, the response (as I understood it) that TimBL gave at the time was that the sets of Web resources and RDF resources are not identical. My reading is that Web resources (i.e. those identified by URIs -- without fragments) are a subset of RDF resources (roughly, anything denoted by a URI+optional fragment ID). It seems to me, then, that an RDF resource identified by UTI+fragment must be distinct from a view of a Web resource similarly identified, because the latter must depend on the MIME type of a retrieved entity. (Though in some cases there may be a strong correlation between these.) #g ------------------------------------------------------------ Graham Klyne Baltimore Technologies Strategic Research Content Security Group <Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com> <http://www.mimesweeper.com> <http://www.baltimore.com> ------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Saturday, 16 June 2001 16:19:49 UTC