- From: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@upclink.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 18:51:18 -0500
- To: Sergey Melnik <melnik@db.stanford.edu>
- Cc: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On Friday, June 15, 2001, at 06:49 PM, Sergey Melnik wrote: > IMO reification has a chance to be introduced as a pure model feature > not intrinsically bound to any vocabulary Why do you want this? Is there a reason every RDF application has to understand reification? I hope not, because that will make RDF very confusing. > In this perspective, it would not go under 'vocabularies'. Similarly, > namespaces and literals are another two model features that might go > into one of the layers in the 'core'. To my knowledge, you still have not explained how namespaces fit into the model. If I missed this somewhere, please send me a pointer. I'm quite curious what you mean. -- [ "Aaron Swartz" ; <mailto:me@aaronsw.com> ; <http://www.aaronsw.com/> ]
Received on Friday, 15 June 2001 19:52:33 UTC