- From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 12:34:17 +0100
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
My message:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Jun/0168.html gives
part of my view of the problem space partition. To expand on that a
little, I think the following areas can be identified:
RDF core:
minimum abstract graph syntax and associated interpretation.
Interpretation of this is mandatory for any RDF processor.
RDF "standard library":
Common features, such as containers, that can be built using
core constructs and additional vocabulary defined in the
rdf: namespace.
RDF schema:
The basic RDF class system and associated inference rules.
XML serialization of RDF:
This will cover serialization of core features, and may also
include some XML syntactic sugar for "standard library"
features (e.g. rdf:li).
#g
At 10:45 PM 6/13/01 +0100, Brian McBride wrote:
>There have been a number of proposed partitionings. I suggest that we have
>a look at the various proposals and schedule some telecon time Friday to
>discuss this.
>
>If you know of a previously posted suggestion for a partitioning, or have
>one you'd like to propose, please can post (a pointer to) it to the list.
------------------------------------------------------------
Graham Klyne Baltimore Technologies
Strategic Research Content Security Group
<Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com> <http://www.mimesweeper.com>
<http://www.baltimore.com>
------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Thursday, 14 June 2001 07:39:47 UTC