- From: R.V.Guha <guha@guha.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 18:31:35 -0700
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- CC: rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
This whole distinction between ID and about is trouble waiting to happen. RDF may be embedded in messages (like SOAP) that might not have a url of any sort. In this case, the distinction between id and about, and the proposal to use "#" which is based on the idea of anchors all lead to nothing but trouble. guha Brian McBride wrote: > With reference to action: > > AP: 2001-06-08#4: Brian McBride to write up this third proposed > interpretation > > A third proposal is to regard: > > <rdf:Description rdf:ID="foo"/> > > as equivalent to: > > <rdf:Description rdf:about="#foo"/> > > Brian
Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2001 21:33:24 UTC