- From: R.V.Guha <guha@guha.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 18:28:05 -0700
- To: Sergey Melnik <melnik@db.stanford.edu>
- CC: jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Thats a function of the machinery used for the definition. If you want to use standard model theory, I don't see why you could use all the rdf on all the servers in the world. guha Sergey Melnik wrote: > > > Let me give an example. We expect to find RDF statements on many > webpages and in many online data sources. Specific applications > typically consider only a subset of all available data (e.g. certain > domain, certain set of trusted servers, certain vocabularies, etc.) I > was trying to convey the idea that meaningful semantics exists only for > such limited datasets, whose boundaries are determined in a particular > application context. It probably would be inappropriate to refer to the > set of all webpages on public servers when say defining the semantics of > rdf:type. > > Sergey
Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2001 21:30:33 UTC