- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 11:56:43 +0100
- To: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@upclink.com>
- CC: rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Hi Aaron, DaveB is on holiday for a couple of weeks. I don't think we can get closure without Dave's participation. Brian Aaron Swartz wrote: > > Now that we've wrapped up rdfms-empty-property-elements I suggest that it's > time to finish rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr. I hope I'm not stepping > outside of my bounds here (as DaveB is really the issue owner) but I'd like > to put forth a proposal. > > I'd suggest that the example in the issues list: > > <rdf:Description> > <foo:bar rdf:ID="foobar" rdf:resource="http://foobar"/> > </rdf:Description> > > be interpreted as: > > _:genid foo:bar <http://foobar> . > <#foobar> rdf:subject _:genid . > <#foobar> rdf:predicate foo:bar . > <#foobar> rdf:object <http://foobar> . > > DaveB, in his original proposal[1], decided that ID and resource could not > be used because in an empty XML element, ID pointed to the object of the > element. He later said[2] that the issue could be looked at again if > empty-property-elements were decided differently. As they are now decided to > eliminate the portion of the spec that cause the confusion, I suggest that > the interpretation of ID be changed to fit with the test case above. > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001May/0088.html > [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001May/0164.html > > -- > [ :name "Aaron Swartz" ] is dc:author of <> .
Received on Tuesday, 12 June 2001 06:58:23 UTC