W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > June 2001

Re: Question about test cases. Was: Proposal for rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 11:54:48 +0100
Message-ID: <3B25F4F8.8D8BC29C@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
CC: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@upclink.com>, rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Hi Jan,

I understand the problem.  If we can get a permanent directory structure for
test cases then the problem will go away.

How about for the moment we assume that all test cases have uri's of the
following form:


and results are


where [issue-id] is e.g. rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr


Jan Grant wrote:
> OK, one more try. I'm pretty ambivalent about the xml:base issue.
> However, because the value of rdf:id is syntactically an XML name
> symbol (not a URI), which appears to get resolved into an absolute URI
> dependant on the base URI of the RDF it appears in, I _can't_ post my
> test cases and results to the list in the same email unless I have a
> moment of prescience, wherever they use nonabsolute URIs.
> We agreed that ntriples should use absolute URIs. So while Aaron's
> output is highly suggestive:
> >     <#foobar> rdf:subject _:genid .
> the subject there looks illegal to me.
> That's why xml:base appears in the rdf:RDF element containing a couple
> of test cases. If someone has an easy way to fix this, please let me
> know. If that means extending ntriples to use this URI-base-unaware
> notation, fine, but I'd like to see a definitive
> draw-a-line-under-it-and-go-no-further ntriples definition.
> Cheers,
> jan
> --
> jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/
> Tel +44(0)117 9287163 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 RFC822 jan.grant@bris.ac.uk
> __/\____/\_____/\____/|_____________________________________ flatline
Received on Tuesday, 12 June 2001 06:56:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:24:01 UTC