- From: Art Barstow <barstow@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 17:52:36 -0400
- To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 01:14:26PM -0500, Dan Connolly wrote: > > I suggest the expected results are: > > _:id1 <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type> > "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#Statement" . > _:id1 <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#subject> > "http://example.com/resource" . > _:id1 <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#predicate> > "http://example.com/predicate" . > _:id1 <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#object> "literal" . Since Dave and DanC seem to be in agreement wrt the resulting N-Triples, is anyone aware of implementations that differ from this interpretation? [FWIW, this output matches the ARP and SiRPAC parsers.]
Received on Thursday, 30 August 2001 17:52:36 UTC