- From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 15:27:33 +0100
- To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
- CC: jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
>>>jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com said: > while at next telecon agenda items, > what about the N-triples/MT related questions > 1. predicate ::= uriref versus predicate ::= uriref | namedNode? Does RDF allow, let's call it, non-URI-ref for predicates? I don't think so, at present. In the graph model in the original M&S, predicates are arrows with URIs, they are never empty circles. > 2. why do we use the term namedNode for a node which is in fact not named? It was anonNode - which was probably worse, so I changed it. How about princeNode? It is just a token in the N-Triples grammar and if it will reduce any implied meaning by changing the characters of the token, let's do it. > ps question 1 is in fact related with the problem to write > e.g. the following N-triples > <#a> _:x <#d>. > _:x <#b> <#c>. > in RDF/XML syntax > Jeremy/Dave, do you have trouble with that? Well at present I say it is illegal N-Triples. Dave
Received on Wednesday, 29 August 2001 10:27:38 UTC