- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 22:08:01 -0500
- To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
I'm adding container support to an RDF parser tonight... it sure is nice to have a pile of test cases to work with. But this one looks totally bogus. Did we really endorse this one? If so, would somebody show me the record? http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema/test004.rdf http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema/test004.nt why aren't e1 and e4 treated the same way? Also... this test involves reification; did we consciously decide how reification works here? -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Tuesday, 21 August 2001 23:08:04 UTC